Friday, March 9, 2012

A Japanese Red Harvest


Here is a review of Yojimbo by critic Roger Ebert. read it and check in at the end.


Yojimbo
A fistful of samurai

Release Date: 1961
By Roger Ebert Apr 10, 2005


Almost the first thing the samurai sees when he arrives is a dog trotting down the main street with a human hand in its mouth. The town seems deserted until a nervous little busybody darts out and offers to act as an employment service: He'll get the samurai a job as a yojimbo -- a bodyguard. The samurai, a large, dusty man with indifference bordering on insolence, listens and does not commit. He wants sake and something to eat.


So opens "Yojimbo" (1961), Akira Kurosawa's most popular film in Japan. He was deliberately combining the samurai story with the Western, so that the wind-swept main street could be in any frontier town, the samurai (Toshiro Mifune) could be a gunslinger, and the local characters could have been lifted from John Ford's gallery of supporting actors.


Ironic, that having borrowed from the Western, Kurosawa inspired one: Sergio Leone's "A Fistful of Dollars" (1964), with Clint Eastwood, is so similar to "Yojimbo" that homage shades into plagiarism. Even Eastwood's Man With No Name is inspired, perhaps, by the samurai in "Yojimbo." Asked his name, the samurai looks out the window, sees a mulberry field, and replies, "Kuwabatake Sanjuro," which means "30-year-old mulberry field." He is 30, and that is a way of saying he has no name.


He also has no job. The opening titles inform us that in 1860, after the collapse of the Tokugawa Dynasty, samurai were left unemployed and wandered the countryside in search of work. We see Sanjuro at a crossroads, throwing a stick into the air and walking in the direction it points. That brings him to the town, to possible employment, and to a situation that differs from Hollywood convention in that the bad guys are not attacking the good guys because there are no good guys: "There is," the critic Donald Richie observes, "almost no one in the whole town who for any conceivable reason is worth saving." It's said Kurosawa's inspiration was Dashiell Hammett's novel Red Harvest, in which a private eye sets one gang against another.


Sanjuro's strategy is to create great interest about himself while keeping his motives obscure. He needs money and so presumably must hire himself out as a bodyguard to one of the two warring factions. There is the silk dealer and the sake merchant, both with private armies, who occupy headquarters at either end of the town. In between, the townspeople cower behind closed shutters and locked doors, and the film's visuals alternate between the emptiness of the windswept street, shots looking out through the slats of shutters and the chinks in walls, and shots from outdoors showing people peering through their shutters.


Richie, whose writings on Kurosawa are invaluable, notes that Kurosawa's shots are always at right angles to what they show; they either look straight up and down the street, or straight into or out of the buildings, and "there are very few diagonal shots." The purpose may be to emphasize the simplicity of the local situation: Two armies face each other, the locals observe the main street as if it's a stage, and the samurai himself embodies the diagonal -- the visitor who stands at an angle to everyone and upsets the balance of power. Indeed, in a crucial early scene, as the two sides face each other nervously from either end of the street and dart forward fearfully in gestures of attack, Sanjuro sits high above the action in the central bell tower, looks down and is vastly amused.


His strategy is to hire himself out as a yojimbo to first one side and then the other, and do no actual bodyguarding at all. His amorality is so complete that we are a little startled when he performs a good deed. A farmer and his wife, possibly the only two good people in the town, are kidnapped. Sanjuro, employed by the side that kidnapped them, kills their six guards, frees them, tears up a house to make it look like there was a fierce struggle, and blames it on the other side. Disloyal to his employer? Yes, but early in the film, he is offered 50 ryo by one of the leaders, only to overhear the man's wife telling him, "We'd save the whole 50 ryo if we killed him after he wins."


Sanjuro's strategy is an elaborate chess game in which he is playing for neither side but plans instead to upset the board. "In this town, I'll get paid for killing," he muses, "and this town would be better off if they were dead." His planning is upset by the unexpected appearance of Unosuke (Tatsuya Nakadai), the younger brother of one of the sake dealer's bodyguards. The samurai often walk about with their empty sleeves flapping at the sides, their arms folded inside their kimonos. (Eastwood, in the Leone movies, always keeps one hand under his poncho.) When Unosuke finally reveals one of his hands, it holds a pistol -- the first one seen in the village. This upsets the balance of power and tilts against Sanjuro's plans, which depend on his skill as a swordsman who can kill any number of the others without being wounded himself.


The gun provides Unosuke with a sneaky kind of self-confidence, and he produces the weapon gloatingly from time to time. Occasionally, he kills people in cold blood, just to prove that he can, in events leading up to a final bloodbath. One of the first people Sanjuro meets in the town is the coffin-maker, and there is a nice moment when he first goes out to do battle and advises him, "Two coffins. Noon, maybe three." By the end there is no business for the coffin-maker, because there is no one to pay for coffins.


That kind of dark humor is balanced in the film by other moments approaching slapstick, as when the injured Sanjuro is smuggled away in a large barrel; when his bearers pause in the middle of the street, the samurai tilts up the lid of the barrel to provide a droll commentary on the progress of the manhunt for him.


Richie believes "Yojimbo" is the best-photographed of Kurosawa's films (by Kazuo Miyagawa, who also shot "Rashomon" and such other Japanese classics as Ozu's "Floating Weeds" and Mizoguchi's "Ugetsu"). The wide screen is fully employed for dramatic compositions, as when the armies face each other across an empty space. And there is a dramatic sense of depth in scenes were Sanjuro holds the foreground while forces gather in the background. Shutters, sliding doors and foreground objects bring events into view and then obscure them, and we get a sense of the town as a collection of fearful eyes granted an uncertain view of certain danger.


"Yojimbo" was followed quickly by Kurosawa’s “Sanjuro” (1962), which also stars Mifune, the greatest modern Japanese actor, playing the same character or one so similar as makes no difference. He acts as the adviser for nine uncannily similar brothers who are remarkably inept samurai. The choreography in "Sanjuro" is one of its best jokes; the brothers do everything together: Nod, recoil, agree, laugh, gasp, and they follow Sanjuro in a kind of conga line, until he snaps, "We can't move around like a centipede."


The difference between the two films is that "Sanjuro" is a comedy in which ancient samurai traditions are exposed as ludicrous by the pragmatic hero, while "Yojimbo" is more subversive: The samurai were famed for their unyielding loyalty to their employers, but Sanjuro, finding himself unemployed because of the collapse of the feudal system, becomes a modern man and is able to manipulate both sides because they persist in thinking he will be faithful to those who pay him.


There is a moment at the end when old and new hang in the balance. The wounded Sanjuro no longer has his sword, but we have seen him practicing with a knife -- skewering a bit of paper as it flutters around a room. He faces Unosuke, the gunman. Without revealing precisely what happens between them, let me ask you to consider the moment when Unosuke aims his pistol at Sanjuro. It may be loaded, it may not be. Sanjuro cannot be absolutely sure. He is free to move away or to disarm Unosuke, but instead he sits perfectly motionless, prepared to accept whatever comes. This, it strikes me, is the act of a samurai aware that his time has passed and accepting with perfect equanimity whatever the new age has to offer.


We're having an online discussion. You know what to do. Grab an idea and start posting. Comment, question, and challenge your peers. We're looking for participation - quantity as well as quality.

145 comments:

  1. While I didn't like this charachter, I thought giving the opposite samurai a gun was an interesting choice because it's stepping away from the normal samurai with just a sword.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It does more than that...Anyone?

      Delete
    2. You weren't supposed to like this guy. Are you supposed to like the villain. I think Mr. Cowlin said yesterday that this was just like the third kind of western, the birth of industrialization. This is what Unosuke represents.

      Delete
    3. Narmandakh OtgonmunhkMarch 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM

      I think the guy with a gun kind of powers the others just because he has a gun. I mean i felt like the wandering samurai was a little scared by the gun, when he first saw that the other guy had a gun!

      Delete
    4. Well I understand that it was supposed to be the old vs. the new theme but i thought the gun was a bad addition as well. It just makes the whole movie feel so superficial and in a way away from tradition. There are so many movies in the world that portray our modern materialistic, superficial society that i wanted a movie that would have morality, justice and tradition as a base. I loved every part of the humor and the fighting and the whole plot except for that concept. I understand why its there but i don't think it created the effect it was seeking.

      Delete
    5. I understand why my peers felt that the gun was a bad addtions, it's because it's not what they had expected so they don't like it.

      Delete
    6. I totally agree but it was the point. The bad guys always have the good stuff and good guys are the under dogs. yet still the good guys make a last stand and win. Part of it was to be funny but really it was for the 3 eras of a western. of course this a Japanese movie but they were based of of westerns. it was for the last ere the death or the final days of a western.

      Delete
  2. Ebert says, "Let me ask you to consider the moment when Unosuke aims his pistol at Sanjuro. It may be loaded, it may not be. Sanjuro cannot be absolutely sure. He is free to move away or to disarm Unosuke, but instead he sits perfectly motionless, prepared to accept whatever comes. This, it strikes me, is the act of a samurai aware that his time has passed and accepting with perfect equanimity whatever the new age has to offer."

    Reactions?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At that point in the movie I was confused by his choice to sit there motionless and just take what he gets. He was playing with death there and he got really lucky that the other samuri didn't shoot him.

      Delete
    2. I think hwe did that becuase he knew Unosuke wouldn't be able to shoot him. I don't think he thought his time had passed becaus if he did then he wouldn't have came back to help his friend.

      Delete
    3. I think this goes along with No Country For Old Men, and having to deal with the changing times. Sanjuro is accepting the idea of new weaponry and he does not let it phase him. He will not bow down or cower from a man who is weaker than him but simply poseses a powerful weapon, therefore making him "stong".

      Delete
    4. I loved this moment. I think it was the most serious part of the whole movie. You see a comedy in most of it, but now as he stares at the gun ready to face fate i felt anxious to see what will happen to our hero. I no longer was laughing or smiling. I was closely waiting for something to happen. That's why i loved this part so much. This scene was by far my favorite.

      Delete
    5. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 12:00 PM

      Yeah i agree with Antonika Because if he had tought about it then he was probably just getting ready for what was going to happen

      Delete
    6. I agree with Kendall but i have something to add as well. I feel like this is based on tradition as well which was a huge part of this movie. He knew his intentions were to shoot him but he stayed because he was a wander and if his road was to end there then it would. It had less to do with saving a life and more to do with what your life is to be. The belief in fate really is displayed by his actions.

      Delete
    7. When the author said: "New age" it confused me. But what I think he meant by it is that the time of samurai is over, and it is time now for a new and modern Japan. Do you guys agree?

      Delete
    8. I agree with you Keelan. Ithink when the author said "New age" he was referring to the gun and maybe the gambling as well. The old Japan is gone, the Samaraii culture is almost gone. I think "New age" is the modernization of Japan

      Delete
    9. I thought this scene was a great example of Yojimbo following the criteria of a Western film. "Early-to-mid century Western tales are often morality tales; later Westerns explore the ambiguity of such naivete and question whether or not life actually does have value." Sanjuro did not just throw his life in the hands of Unosuke. He was satisfied with leaving his life to fate in this scene. This is a sign of a true samurai. Will Unosuke die before he can shoot? Is the gun actually empty? Sanjuro did not question this, he simply left it to fate.

      Delete
    10. I also agree with keelan because i think the new age is referring to an actual "new age", with the samurai age ending and a new, reformed japan.i also liked this scene a lot because in my head i was thinking is this guy suicidal or something?but it just really got my attention til the last second and i felt like that scene had a meaning to it; bringing me back to the point of the "new age" with the samurai thinking his time is done.

      Delete
  3. Before I viewed the film, Yojimbo, I was very skeptical about it. To my surprise it was a veryy good, entertaining, action packed comedy film. This opened up a new door to many more films i want to watch now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why specifically? And what kind of films are you now interested?

      How about the rest of you? Did this film turn you on to other films (and what kind)? Or off?

      Delete
    2. I couldn't agree more. The fact that it was a foreign film from the 50s in black and white was really the furthest thing from "expected" I could have anticipated from a movie, and yet this is one of the best (if not the best) movie that I have seen in film studies yet (in both times that I've taken it)... Not just in terms of story line or cinematography, but in terms of a great surprise rewarded to an open mind.

      Delete
    3. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 11:50 AM

      I agree, i also thought it was very entertaining. I wasn't expecting much from the start but as i started watching it made more and more sinse. I love it . And it's also very funny too !

      Delete
    4. Yes it was veryy good and I enjoyed how we get a variety of feeling.For example, in one scene you may laugh, but in the next you could be sitting on the edge of your seat from suspense.

      Delete
    5. It didn't get me interested in any movies specifically. I just kind of felt like the slow pace of the movie lost my attention quite a few times. I guess I'm the kind of guy that needs to be hooked right away or else the movie loses my attention. That's sometimes bad because there are many good movies that start off slow, and end great. But, I feel like a really good movie keeps you hooked all the way through

      Delete
    6. It turned me on to more samuri movies and foreign films. I didnt think I was going to like that there were subtitles the whole time but it actually brought me more into the movie and brought me closer to the characters.

      Delete
    7. I agree with everyone. I have started to see more black and white movies. When I was a kid, I saw my brother watching "Dr. Strangelove" and then later "Seven Samurai." I took one look and thought because they were in black and white, they were boring. I actually did watch "Dr. Strangelove" a little while ago, and now that I have see that, "Psycho," and "Yojimbo," I think I'll start taking a look at more black and white movies.

      Delete
    8. I did not like this movie,but I thought it was odd that it had comedy in it. I didn't expect that, but that was the only thing I liked about the movie.

      Delete
    9. I honestly prefer foreign films.... Its a brand new culture that you probably have no idea of, and personally I love subtitles because its easier for me to follow the story, the plot, and still be able to focus on cinematography and other elements. You never know how one culture or country's film making may differ from the next.

      Delete
    10. I was also skeptical about watching a samuri movie because I dont find action movies to be that interesting. I liked how Yo Jimbo was like a game and you were trying to figure out how Sanjuro was going to manipulate the warring parties I also thought the main character was really hard core and witty. He also walked with a cool deminore and remained calm. His sarcasic comments were actually funny and I was suprised I would find an old Japanese movie to be comical.

      Delete
    11. I've always been interested in all types of movies and i never thought that there was an issue in seeing a black&white movie or a colored movie. I've always respected both types as long as they were meaningful movies. I wish we would watch heavy movies which really played with your psyche. I love being challenged by an overpowering thought or character in a movie since it gives the movie a sort of supreme challenge. It also offers an oppurtunity to view something that challenges your beliefs. I like movies that make me question what i know and the status quo.

      Delete
    12. I agree with Boyan. I enjoy all types of movies and watch new types with an open mind. What i really like though is like what Boyan said. I want to be challenged, and think why this scene is happening or why something is there. I liked Yojimbo, but i feel like it was really simple. I thought it was a cool story, but it seemed to easy.

      Delete
    13. Yojimbo has made me interested in seeing other foreign films. I also feel more open to watching black and white films. On the other hand, Yojimbo has turned me away from old action movies.

      Delete
    14. I also agree. When we first started to watch Yojimbo I thought it was very strange and a bit boring first. However, as the film progressed, I found myself more interested in it and it got me to open up to odd japan movies and films of different cultures.

      Delete
  4. "This, it strikes me, is the act of a samurai aware that his time has passed and accepting with perfect equanimity whatever the new age has to offer.". I couldn't agree more with this statement. I feel that the Samurai has a sense of nobility within him no matter what ends up happening; that if he has served in the way that he wants to, has protected his people or morals, then whatever demise should come to him (if it does) is justified and not feared. This peaceful acceptance is what really sets a samurai aside from any other human being.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone know what seppuku is?

      Delete
    2. Honorable suicide...

      Delete
    3. I'm not sure, but I think it's when the samurai, after destroying his honor, kills himself.

      Delete
    4. Could you call it a martyr?

      Delete
    5. I agree with dakota. A samurai has morals and beliefs that no other people in Japan had at the time. His decision in giving him the gun back shows that he still believes in them and would die for them.

      Delete
    6. @Joey, I feel like you could.. one of my favourite movies is actually a french film titled Martyrs and it has a very similar point made in terms of suffering, endurance, honour, and acceptance.

      Delete
    7. to be specific, seppuku is the act of kneeling, slicing your abdomen open then removing your bowels by hand to regain honor that you have lost

      Delete
    8. I agree with Dakota and think that a samuri's true beleifs were portrayed in the scene where the other bodyguard had a pistol pointed at Sanjuro. Sanjuro could have easily ran away, but that would have shown cowardliness. Being brave seems to be a big theme here. Sanjuro laughs when he sees how the men are afraid to fight one another and when it is him against many at the end, he comes in swiging,unafraid.

      Delete
  5. Being a samurai means means you carry your self with honor and loyolty. When Sanjuro stays calm and motion less throughout that last scene, i think he was just following the "Bushido" code and letting fate kind of take over. Any other way of him reacting would have been a dishonorable way to go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What does it say about the guy with the gun?

      Delete
    2. I was agreeing with what Joey said about the interesting addition of the gun

      Delete
    3. It portrays a coward.... especially with him (obviously) deceiving Sanjuro by saying "I just want to die with my gun in my hand, I feel empty without it", and then trying to fire it of... He obviously didn't die with the same acceptance of his fate; absolutely no nobility or honour to be found here.

      Delete
    4. Well the guy with the gun is a dishonarable samurai because he desides to use a gun. At the same time how he desides to not kill Sanjuro is kind of honarable but that doesnt make up for him "cheating" and using the pistol.

      Delete
    5. I agree its basically cheating because you can kill someone from far range without doing anything, whereas a TRUE samurai needs to actually work and get in closer to kill his opponent.

      Delete
    6. It says that Unosuke is a more modernized that Sanjuro. It shows that Sanjuro is still living the ancient ways of the samurai and Unosuke is more industrialized.

      Delete
    7. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 12:04 PM

      i agree i think the guy with a gun is just not a true samurai because they never have guns they use their sword! and if has a gun instead of it his just probably really scared and doesn't really know what to do.

      Delete
    8. I think it shows that the guy with the gun is nothing without it. I doupt he knows how to use a sword.

      Delete
  6. Yeah, I am going to have to agree. I felt the gun really took away from the samurai feel of the movie. I feel like Kurosawa making it a western wasn't a good thing. When I heard we were watching a samurai movie I was hoping to see a lot of sword fights, and cool samurai tactics. In this movie we didn't see that. I thought it was kind of boring to be honest, it was good, but boring, if that makes any sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Danny - I don't think the gun is what made it a Western. The rural setting, the desolate town, one against many, code of honor versus the law, the tone and pacing of the film - these are the elements that make this movie Western-based. In fact, one could argue that the gun is the one element NOT like a Western. It would be like having a machine gun in High Noon...

      Delete
    2. And cool sword fighting is next week when we travel to China...

      Delete
    3. I wouldn't say it was boring as a whole, but I can see why you would say that because at times you don't know what's going on and it jsut seems like your watching meaningless dialogue.

      Delete
    4. I'm not saying the gun specifically made it a western. I'm just saying that's one reason I felt it took away from the samurai feel.

      Delete
    5. I see where your getting at, Danny. But i have to agree with Mr. Cowlin. I actual thought that the gun did not take anything away from the movie. I think it just added another aspect to it. I believe the gun is a symbol for the industrialization of samaraii culture. It is showing how the old samaraii ways are vanishing. New things are coming; like the gun and gambling.

      Delete
    6. The gun symbolizes the New era, The Industrialization not so much a western. The western is the showdowns and "one vs. many" so to speak.

      Delete
    7. Yeah, I know what you're getting at. I'm just saying, I thought it took away from the samurai movie I was expecting to see

      Delete
    8. I agree. The gun really took away the whole samurai feeling and it kind of killed the whole moment of everything.

      Delete
  7. I think that this article finishes with quite the conclusion. I loved the gun pistol scene since it showed the bravery that a samurai must display. Standing in front of the gun and letting life progress causes the audience to also see how bad of a samurai Unosuke(the younger brother) is. I wish there could have been more moral code actions in this movie but i'm very satisfied with it either way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love your point! I understand why everyone is focusing on how it was a cheap shot for him to have the gun, but by seeing it from the other perspective on how its even more of a challenge for the samurai to step up to is really, really cool.. It seems like after swords and knives, you've already gotten the point across of their bravery, but add in this whole new element (despite how unfair it may make the game) and it really adds a nice twist to everything.

      Delete
    2. It adds a twist i'll admit and even a whole new level of depth to the movie I'm just not a fan that much. I know i'm not supposed to be a fan and that its doing its role its just i feel like its doing it too well. Thats just my perspective though.

      Delete
    3. The scene also adds to Sanjuro's ignorance. When the man says that he already fired two shots so it does not have more bullets, Sanjuro is too ignorant of the new ways to know that this simply isn't true. This moment also plays to the audience's sense of pride. WE know that the gun holds six shots, and we therefore feel superior to Sanjuro in some small way. ("I wouldn't fall for that! I'm too smart!") And this is the psychological set up...We might be to smart to get into the situation, but we are also too cowardly to face it once it occurs. Our feeling of superiority is quickly smashed to pieces as soon as we see the amount of dignity with which Sanjuro holds himself.

      Delete
    4. He seems so composed though even after Unosuke fires. If he were ignorant up to that point you would expect a reaction out of him wouldn't you? Then again maybe thats what being a samurai is about, composure even when your life could have been gone a second ago. He is tough though since he is a wandering samurai so maybe that's it too.

      Delete
  8. I did not like this movie and it's really hard for to believe that this was one of the most popular movie in Japan.The characters were great, but there was nothing about the movie that interest me. Most of the scene made me want to sleep.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You said that you thought the characters were great but the scenes made you want to sleep, what about the scenes made you want to sleep? I'm just wondering.

      Delete
    2. They were just boring.There was nothing to it. Like the scene where the samurai was in the bar drinking

      Delete
  9. When i saw Sanjuro allows the other guy to get the pistol, it really shocked me. Sanjuro's character is wise, clever, and serious man. He knew the man was lying. I kept on thinking "why is he doing this". I think I understand now that he knew that the sumarai were outdated that they will soon become useless and that dying with ending of a successful battle, it would have been honorable and worthy of a true samurai.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I also think it was a matter of his accepting his fate, whatever it may be like a true samurai.

      Delete
    2. Yes exactly in that moment it became clear that he had accepted his fate and was at peace about it.

      Delete
    3. I think that there's an aspect in Japanese culture that would make this scene less crazy than we think it is. We're missing the instilled idea of honor and strict moral codes in our modern individualistic societies.

      Delete
  10. I still think we should watch "Lone Wolf and Cub"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! I think so too. I loved the preview and it seem like the type of movie us teenagers would love.

      Delete
    2. Then go watch it. I cannot show it in class...New...dit...tee.

      Delete
    3. That's not really what I meant...but yeah I guess, I just think it looked cool

      Delete
    4. I think one thing I like most about this film was that even though it was a samurai movie it had a fair amount of comedy. You really don't see that a lot.

      Delete
    5. Vigo Mortenson's butt...don't you recall?

      Delete
    6. sorry got posted in the wrong spot. It was supposed to be its own comment

      Delete
    7. I think if we can't see "Lone Wolf and Cub," we should watch something like a Bruce Lee movie, or Godzilla. I also think that we should watch other kinds of foreign films. My sister told me about a really gritty and interesting film about Hitler during his last days. I also think that "Letters from Iwo Jima" would be interesting. It's hard to find foreign films, as interesting as they are, because they are not often in the video store.

      Delete
    8. I forgot it had New...dit...tee in it.

      Delete
    9. a clockwork orange? or maybe requiem of a dream? fight club? something that is just kind of strange and different we should watch. i know we cant watch any of these i class because of nudity and excessive swearing but something like these movies where everyone has a problem or that the "hero" is not the good guy

      Delete
  11. I think "Yojimbo" is more story based than anything. It's definitely not an intense action movie like Kung-fu movies or how most samurai movies are after this one. I found this movie very creative in that sense. You really get to know the town and the sickening villains that lived in it. I also like how there was both comedy and lots of dramatic moments. It is one of the best basic good vs. evil movies I have seen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. While not having a lot of action, it has a very good story that makes the film entertaining.

      Delete
    2. I agree, and I like it. Instead of being wow-ed by crazy scenes and intense unpredictable movements, I was able to follow (and ENJOY) a story that made sense from beginning to end.

      Delete
    3. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 12:09 PM

      i Agree toooo ! i think there is more to it because i see that in this film their trying to bring back the villigers together and rebuild everything that has been broken !

      Delete
    4. Billy, you nailed it. These films are story driven. Their Chinese counter parts - the kung fu film - was more action driven. Samurai movies are, by their very nature, slow and methodical. That's not to say boring, mind you. Just methodical.

      Delete
  12. Actually quick question for Cowlin, not regarding Yojimbo, what did you think of my idea about watching movies that were up for best picture but didn't win? you gave the example of Forrest Gump beating Pulp Fiction

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I already have it scheduled. However, we can't watch Pulp Fiction, and I can't watch Forest Gump. We will be viewing two from the same year in the 70s. One won for best picture, and one was nominated but lost the same year...Any guesses which two I picked?

      Delete
    2. Why can't we watch Forrest Gump?

      Delete
    3. Because it's on TBS and TNT like every weekend! I'm so sick of that movie, it's good but honestly, I think I have it memorized

      Delete
    4. I think it's going to be Jaws and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. I remember Jaws was crossed out on our independent viewing project list so I'm guessing it's those too.

      Delete
    5. Mr. Cowlin are you planning on showing any of the Godfather movies? Those were in the 70's

      Delete
    6. Pulp fiction rocked though, its hilarious in so many aspects.

      Delete
  13. The resaons you liked this movie, are the same reasons I don't like this movie, exect for the comedy. As you said, "It's definitely not an intense action movie like Kung-fu Movies". I thought the actions were going to be more intense; I was waiting for the big moment, but it never came. I think that's why I don't like this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If you were in Sanjuro's position when the other samurai was pointing the pistol at him how would you have reacted?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally, I would have taken my sword and chopped his head off just to save myself. I know it is dishonorable but this is your life your talking about, and no one is around to see you kill him because everyone else is dead.

      Delete
    2. I would probably take the gun and empty it just to make sure. I also thought what Sanjuro did was smart because he waited until the other samurai was weaker.

      Delete
    3. During the fight, or at the end when he almost takes one last shot?

      Delete
    4. I think my survival instinct would immidiately kick in. Yet if I had the training Sanjuro had and his morals I would think I would react as he did but maybe not as peaceful

      Delete
    5. i would have done exactly what he did i would have sat there and done absolutely nothing

      Delete
    6. Well being Sanjuro means that you've lived your whole life based Bushido, so in that situatuion and from what you've been taught for to be a samurai i would have down the same.

      Delete
    7. If you were a samurai you would accept what's coming. I probably would have emptied it too. Obviously Sanjuro felt lucky.

      Delete
    8. I mean, at that point you already know you won no matter what. Even if you die, the guy with a pistol is gonna die too... And everybody saw it happen, and you'll go down in their memory as being exactly the honourable person you were set out to be.

      Delete
    9. I agree with Sanjuro's actions. I think i would have done the same since i would not rid a man of his last wishes. I believe in fate as well so i would welcome the coming events as they came rather than anticipate.

      Delete
    10. It was smart of him to run in zigzag to aviod getting shot. I would have ran behind one the buildings and let him waste his shots.

      Delete
  15. I think one thing I like most about this film was that even though it was a samurai movie it had a fair amount of comedy. You really don't see that a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know right you expected to be full of discussions about honor and very serious. Yet it had a good amount of comedy which in the end made it a better film.

      Delete
    2. That is a very good point! I'm not sure how acurate that statement is about the comedy thing but it was a very good aspect in the film.

      Delete
    3. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 12:17 PM

      I agree i thought that was really cool and different in a way, because you don't see that often in samurai movies ! lol

      Delete
    4. Consider that the director Kurosawa was making a samurai movie second, and a movie first.

      Delete
    5. I agree i really liked the comedy they put into the film! It added a nice touch to the movie. I never thought I would laugh at a samurai film based in the 1800's!

      Delete
  16. Narmandakh OtgonnmunkhMarch 9, 2012 at 12:14 PM

    I think this was a great film ! it's not all about the action like how they kill each other but it's really more about being true to who you really are ! like being a true samurai untill the end ! That's what i loved about this movie the most !

    ReplyDelete
  17. I wish we could see more Samurai in heavy battle armor or just ornate battle armor. I think it would have been interesting and cool to watch very well choreographed scenes between very honor based characters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Check out the poster for The Seven Samurai under the posting Independent Viewing Project Additions. It shows Toshiro Mifune (the actor who played Sanjuro) in battle gear.

      Delete
    2. I get what you are trying to say but at the same time by not having that this film becomes special and interesting.

      Delete
    3. I agree. I think that would be really cool and very intense to watch. Also adding a little blood and gore would add a real dramatic effect as well.

      Delete
    4. I mean ya that would be cool, but I kind of like the fact that it's not like every other samurai.

      Delete
    5. Agreed.. Instead you're forced to pay attention to the small, everyday details of Japan and their culture. I loved the robes..I thought it was so cool.

      Delete
    6. Your right but you have to think logically, it wouldn't make sense for a poor samurai to have an expensive suit of armor, the swords are already expensive enough. besides it wouldn't fit the plot of this movie.

      Delete
  18. Yeah, I guess it's becuase everyone has seen it 12 times already. I think we should watch a couple of more modern movies like an Alexander Payne movie.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I many be off base, but I felt like the other body guard who came to town with the gun didnt look Japanese but more western European looking. This may be a mataphor for how the west may not be as honorable as the ancient samuri are.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. in the poster on top, he looks like the dad from Moder Family

      Delete
    2. Wow I just noticed that. Hilarious!

      Delete
    3. Wow! I never thought anything of it but now that you point it out he doesnt look Japanese. This is really weird I wonder why they did that.

      Delete
    4. I totally agree but it was the point. The bad guys always have the good stuff and good guys are the under dogs. yet still the good guys make a last stand and win. Part of it was to be funny but really it was for the 3 eras of a western. of course this a Japanese movie but they were based of of westerns. it was for the last ere the death or the final days of a western.

      Delete
  20. Okay. I want to know what (1) liked the movie, (2) appreciated the movie, or (3) none of the above.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Definitely 1 & 2!

      Delete
    2. I appreciated the movcie and the precedent and influence it set for other movies to follow.

      Delete
    3. 2 definitely 2.

      Delete
  21. Going into the movie I didn't think for a second that there was gonna be comedy in the movie that I would laugh but i was wrong. The of he comedy was pretty funny. did anyone else feel the same way about this.

    ReplyDelete
  22. We should watch BIRDEMIC

    ReplyDelete
  23. I thought that Yoojimbo was a great Movie. I thought it was totally was a great movie because it was based of western plot. Personally I think that it made the movie more interesting and suspenseful. I loved way the charters talked and I also loved the action. Personally I think that old school Japanese movies are just as cool as movies like Die hard 2. If you think about it its's like that old stuff are cooler than new stuff. Like old muscle cars (60's-73) is more cool and wicked even if the new ones have more modern stuff like CD players and better performance. Besides the ones were based of the old ones, you don't get a nice of interior in looks and quality and the in sound of the engine. But you can spend a little ore so there just as good. Its a lot like that with old movies compared to new ones. New movies are great but in some ways the older ones are better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did like watching Yojimbo, but I feel that concluding that old films are better than new films is an extreme generalization. The fighting scenes, for example, looked too fabricated to me. If Yojimbo was edited with the technology of newer movies, then it would have been a more enjoyable movie in my eyes.

      Delete
  24. by the way did you know they made a comic of Yojimbo check it out at
    http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/usagi-yojimbo

    ReplyDelete
  25. This movie was not at all what I was expecting. Yojimbo definitely exceeded my expectations. I was very surprised to have laughed a couple of times in the movie. I found it interesting that I was laughing at something that was made in 1961. I think that many newer movies (2000 and on) may not have this ability to make the audience laugh 50 years later. I feel like much of comedy in new movies is based off of current events and things that are relevant in people’s lives now that might not be relevant in people’s lives 50 years from now. This is almost like inside jokes between the generation of people living in the time the movie was released. For example, I went to see Crossroads (Glenbrook North’s 2012 variety show). I felt like some of their comedy troupe skits were catered to only North’s alumni, students, and sometimes parents of students and faculty. There were points where I just did not understand why everyone around me was laughing. I saw Paradox’s opening show last year. The audience for this first show was full of faculty and did not have many students. Throughout the entire show, my friend and I were laughing uncontrollably; the show was hilarious! However, we were pretty much the only ones laughing. The faculty could not identify with the problems of dealing with counselors and “lunch ladies.” In conclusion, the comedy in Yojimbo has the capability to continue to humour all audiences, not just 1961 Japan. In my opinion, the comedy in recent movies like Moneyball, The Sitter, or Hot Tub Time Machine will not be able to stand the test of time. Are there any other movies you can think of (past or present) in which the comedy has or you think may be able to be just as funny as the year the movie was released?

    ReplyDelete
  26. I agree with Ebert’s and Richie’s positive reviews on the cinematography. “Kurosawa's shots are always at right angles to what they show; they either look straight up and down the street, or straight into or out of the buildings.” As Ebert said, the simplicity of the shots is reflected in the simplicity of the situation in the film. Another thing I would like to note about the cinematography is its similarity to a Western film. Compare High Noon ( bit.ly/xsc9uo ) to Yojimbo ( bit.ly/yFKvFR ). Not only is the camera work Western-like, so is the entire movie. It follows all the criteria of a Western ( bit.ly/xglwOA ).

    ReplyDelete
  27. Without a doubt, the comedy in Yojimbo was fantastic even though it was released 50 years ago. Sadly, I cannot say the same for the elements of action/violence in this film. Violence in current movies almost always shows blood, pain and suffering. Before I was in Film Studies, I did not really watch movies other than those playing in threatres. Therefore the action and violence I am used to contains these things. Current movies also have the benefit of technology to enhance the fight scenes into something more realistic. The battle scenes in Yojimbo (the one on one scenes in particular) had terrible acting and choreography, in my opinion. (Although I would like to say as a side note: I did enjoy the scene where the two dueling sides go back and forth between attacking with a faux sense of confidence then cowardly retreating.) Because of the time I live in and because of the limited movies I have seen, I did not like the fighting scenes – they looked so unauthentic. When Seibei’s or Ushitora’s henchmen were sliced with a sword, they would stay standing with an expression on their face I like to call the “oh no, I’m going to die” look ( bit.ly/gRymzy 0:50-1:15). I see this in current movies too. My problem with this is that people in real life would not do this, so why do it in a movie? The lack of blood also took away the validity from the scenes. If someone has their stomach sliced open, there WILL be blood. I am sure the 1961 audience was content with the action and violence in this film, but I certainly was not.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I have to admit when i first saw this movie i didnt like it because it just wasnt engaging from the begining as i got further into the movie i started to get more involved in it. the one thing that kept distracting me though was the subtitles because i kept having to read them but that isnt the movie makers fault its no ones. i think the comedy was really great i liked it. i thought the fighting scenes were not as good as they could have been. the one thing that caught my eye was when a gun was pulled out. that was one of the last things that i think would have been pulled out.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I personally really enjoyed this movie. I went into this with an open mind and I was really surprised by the story and even the acting was good. The facial reactions and tone of voice made the characters come alive. Also, sometimes while watching a movie in another language, you miss the story or what is going on because of all the subtitles you have to read. It didn't bother me at all this time though. I hope to see more films by this director in the future.

    ReplyDelete