On the Waterfront was a game changer for cinema. Brando's perfomrance in this film was literally the thing that made actors question everything they were doing. And movies were never the same again.
I found two obituaries and posted them below. The first is of Stella Adler, Brando's acting teacher. It does a pretty good job of explaining what method acting is. The second is Brando's. It hits on what made him the unappointed leader of a new style of acting. read both of them and then I've got a question for you at the end.
Stella Adler, 91, an Actress And Teacher of the Method
By PETER B. FLINT
New York Times, December 22, 1992
Stella Adler, an exponent of Method acting whom many considered the leading American teacher of her craft, died yesterday at her home in Los Angeles. She was 91 years old.
[...]
The Method revolutionized American theater. Classical acting instruction had focused on developing external talents, while Method acting was the first systematized training that also developed internal abilities, sensory, psychological, emotional.
Strasberg, who headed the Actors Studio until his death in 1982, rooted his view of the Method on what Stanislavsky had stressed in his early career, that the actor should perform extensive "affective memory" exercises, improvising and conjuring up "the conscious past" to convey emotion: for example, dwelling on a personal tragedy to show anguish.
Miss Adler, opposing this approach, went to Paris and studied intensively with Stanislavsky for five weeks in 1934. She found he had revised his theories to stress that the actor should create by imagination rather than by memory and that the key to success was "truth, truth in the circumstances of the play."
"Your talent is in your imagination," she taught. "The rest is lice." She discussed plays as scripts for actors, exploring the texts for performance clues. She also believed that the art, architecture and clothes of an era were important in shaping a role. The Limits of Reality
One student volunteered, "When you told me to imagine a lake in Switzerland, I couldn't help but remember a real lake I had seen in Switzerland."
"Then put your lake in Morocco," Miss Adler replied. "You must get away from the real thing because the real thing will limit your acting and cripple you. To think of your own mother's death each time you want to cry onstage is schizophrenic and sick."
"Don't use your conscious past," she advised. "Use your creative imagination to create a past that belongs to your character. I don't want you to be stuck with your own life. It's too little."
She encouraged students to read about Stanislavsky's exercises to ease muscular tension and aid concentration, but she did not teach them. Strasberg contended that she had abandoned the internal emphasis of the Method and that her classes were ineffectual. She argued that he so exceeded Stanislavsky's intent that his teaching was psychologically and emotionally intimidating and dangerous, producing neurotic, self-indulgent actors.
Their approaches were vastly different, but the results could be similar. Ellen Burstyn, who studied with both teachers, as many other actors did, concluded: "Stella stresses imagination and Lee stresses reality. You use Stella's imagination to get to Lee's reality. They are finally talking about the same thing." 'You Can't Be Boring'
Miss Adler demanded not only craftsmanship but also self-awareness, calling it the key to an actor's sense of fulfillment. When students failed to understand roles, she acted them out, insisting: "You can't be boring. Life is boring. The weather is boring. Actors must not be boring."
"Get a stage tone, darling, an energy," she advised, " Never go on stage without your motor running."
Stanislavsky, she said, created a way for actors to bring the truth to audiences to lift their spirits and enrich their lives. One student accused Miss Adler of expecting too much of young people who "haven't gone out in the world and done all that experiencing she talks about." But most of her students shared the view of another who concluded, "Stella Adler taught me more in five minutes today than any of my other teachers have taught me in five years."
Marlon Brando Redefined Acting
He combined method acting with his own inner turmoil
He combined method acting with his own inner turmoil
AP file
July 2, 2004LOS ANGELES - Anyone could imitate Marlon Brando — it was as simple as a scowl, a nasal voice and a scratch of the cheek — but few could copy the skill that made him an icon.
The two-time Oscar winner, who died at age 80, popularized the Method style of performing, which stripped away grandiose theatricality in favor of a deeper psychological approach to inhabiting a character.
Generations of young actors were electrified by Brando’s work as conflicted characters in “A Streetcar Named Desire,” “On the Waterfront” and “The Wild One,” men who were emotionally vulnerable but savagely dangerous at the same time.
He was the bridge between the heroic screen purity of earlier stars such as Cary Grant, Gary Cooper and Henry Fonda and a generation of gritty, conflicted anti-heroes played by the likes of Robert De Niro, Jack Nicholson and Dustin Hoffman.
“He was like a godfather to many young actors worldwide but particularly in this country,” said Robert Duvall, Brando’s “Godfather” co-star.
Even directors who never worked with him benefited indirectly — actors were more willing to push themselves, delve deeper into their own psyches, and submit to endless retakes of scenes both to get it right and try things different ways.
“For my generation and for generations to come, he virtually defined truth and honesty, as an actor and then as a public persona,” “Taxi Driver” director Martin Scorsese said Friday. “Everything that we know about the power of great screen acting relates back to him: when you watch his work in ‘On the Waterfront’ or ‘Last Tango in Paris,’ you’re watching the purest poetry imaginable, in dynamic motion.”
Brando’s impact started decades ago with James Dean, who adapted his fellow actor’s streetwise demeanor in a career cut tragically short. To later generations, Brando embodied a no-nonsense ruggedness: in his pre-fame youth, Russell Crowe once recorded a rock song titled “I Want to Be Like Marlon Brando.”
His contemporaries also were impressed. “Marlon Brando is the epitome of actors today, and all actors since the 1950s have been mimicking him,” Tony Curtis said.
But merely learning the tricks of Method acting didn’t guarantee a great performance.
Drawing on inner torment
What set Brando apart was the way that technique unleashed his inner conflict. The same qualities that made Brando a world-class actor also made him, by some accounts, a world-class pain.
The method seemed to harness his anger, warmth, insecurity, charm, cruelty and weakness — separating those traits from the eccentric streak that would define him later in life.
“He was tremendously respected as an actor. I think his personal conduct or his beliefs or attitudes affected people,” said the actress Janet Leigh, who knew him socially. “Not in a good way.”
His tricks in front of the camera varied. He was famous for rehearsing endlessly, for reshooting scenes again and again.
Other times, like on “The Godfather,” he would tape sheets of paper imprinted with his lines to co-stars Al Pacino and Duvall, reading off their chests while they faced away from the camera. He claimed it added spontaneity to his readings.
Eva Marie Saint, his co-star in “On the Waterfront,” said he could incorporate bits of real life into the script.
The famous scene in which he picks up her dropped glove and uses it to toy with her reluctant and shy character was originally written without the glove. She dropped it in a rehearsal, and Brando began to toy with it while they read lines, pulling it over her hand.
Director Elia Kazan liked the suggestiveness of that, and asked them to do the same thing when the camera was rolling.
“This was an accident, and another actor would have picked it up and restarted the scene,” Saint said. “That was the genius of Marlon, always working.”
Mr. Cowlin here again. Two questions: First, what other acting styles have you seen since the 1950s (either for better or worse)? That is to say, can you give a name to a style of acting that you either like or hate? Give us some examples if you can. Second, what moment of On the Waterfront do you think best illustrates Brando's style of method acting?
By the way, probably Brando's most famous performance is his role in The Godfather, with Apocalypse Now a close second. But my favorite is when he plays Stanley in A Streetcar Named Desire. You want to see mind-bending acting? Rent it. (I also liked him as Superman's dad in Superman the Movie.)
The main other acting method as you described in class is the idea of "line acting" or just acting and providing emotion only based on your lines rather than the character, scene, or movie as a whole. I view this type of acting on a slightly lower level than method acting because there are many actors out there that use this method and do a wonderful acting job. Another style of acting that requires a whole different talent area is Shakespeare. I do not particularly like this style, but it is required to imitate the works of Shakespeare. This style requires crisp movements and a whole new set of emotions because of the era change. These are some different styles of acting that I know a little bit about.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite acting moment in the movie so far is when he is in the bar waiting for Johnny to come back. When he gets in that struggle with the priest, he really displays his true emotions. As it states above in the articles, the method acting brought out his emotion such at anger. I believe during this sequence that this was genuine anger, and he seemed to be having real internal conflict about whether to go after Johnny or not.This is why I think that this is the best acting moment so far.
Other types of acting that I've seen include the traditional":read this script and attempt to memorize". I'm not such a fan of this acting because it doesn't feel natural in the least. Everything about it is queer and forced. Very uncomfortable.
ReplyDeleteA method that I do enjoy though is rather just improvisation. Though it can be very similar to method acting, it isn't always if it's an improvisational skit or play. Not very related to movies, however.
I was really diggin when Brando was in the back of the cab with te other mob man (blanking on his name...) and really made the cab scene work. You can believe his emotion and words and if there's any time that he IS sincerely his film character, it's portrayed in this scene.
Brandon Stark
ReplyDeleteTo be honest, i don't know any kinds of acting but the two we talked about in class. But line acting isn't what i consider a very good acting for every movie. It may work for a few movies, but it kills alot of movies. It shows the the actors/actresses aren't really trying their best and you can't follow the movie or take the movie seriously due to it's distraction.
I have a few scenes u enjoy that show Marlon Brando's acting in work. I like when Terry Malloy (Marlon Brando) is spending time with Edie (Eva Marie Saint). It shows how he wants to change and not be corrupt. But he has a very difficult time doing so. He shows how he has trouble letting his guard around her and trying to change with such struggle. He truly lets the method acting take its course and he truly becomes Terry Malloy.
Truly, besides method acting, I do not know of anything as fun and imaginative. Perhaps that is Stanislavski's genius reflecting like light off a mirror. I guess I could mention a very famous method actor: Heath Ledger. To be the Joker you really have to immerse yourself in his character. Heath did that perfectly. (I heard a rumor he had to lock himself in a hotel room for six months to get that "crazy" effect going, but I doubt its truth.) Getting back on track, I believe Brando's most "methodic" role here was when he was locked face to face with the priest. The way his character rebelled, you really believed he was a kid going through a life filled with crime. I didn't even feel like I was watching a movie!
ReplyDeleteother types of acting i've seen is the stilted type like in Forbidden Planet, which is meant to be dramatic but now comes off as comical.And another type of acting seen in many horribly done low-budget movies is where the actor is like a wall. trying to emote or say their lines with any fluidity.
ReplyDeleteOne actor who, to me, seemed to bring his torment to the characters he played was Brando's Godfather co-star John Cazale. In the Deer Hunter he wasnt on the screen for very long but when he was, the scene almost always belonged to him in my mind.
I must agree with Dakota. I really like when actors/actresses improvise along with their lines because it seems so much more realistic than if they acted traditionally (which I am not the biggest fan of, although sometimes it works). I also agree with Dimitriy- Heath Ledger was one of my favorite actors. The Dark Knight was a really good example of how he really put himself in the character's shoes. He's done many films were he just take over the character. Which brings me to: I really like when actors (not only in the 50s but in general) really study their character and often live like their character for a certain amount of time so when it comes to filming, the role comes more naturally. Ledger for example, studied psychopaths to fit his role.
ReplyDeleteI think the glove scene was a really good example of Brando's own work put into the film. Another scene that I thought was a good example of his method acting was when Terry was in the car with Charlie. Terry (Brando) reacts so well to what charlie says. The way he reacts is hard to describe, I don't think it could be written down on a script. His facial expressions and movements are realistic.
I think I've seen mostly method acting. I really don't think that any style is worse than the other it just depends on the part and how it is acted out. I cannot really say I hate any style.
ReplyDeleteThe scene where I really think you can get to really experience Brando's style of acting was when he was in the car with his brother. When he is talking with his brother in the car you can really feel the emotion coming from his voice. It is almost as if Brando experienced something in his life that was the same thing.
Like some of the previous comments said, I don't know any other acting methods besides the ones we talked about in class (method and classical). I don't hate the style of acting but I think with the classical form of acting, there is much less fluidity to it. The actor is just regurgitating memorized lines and trying to attach emotions to make the character seem as believable as possible. If the actor can pull it off, it's fine, but there is still a lot less depth to the character. Going back to an example that was used in class a lot, comparing Heath Ledger as the Joker, and Christian Bale as Batman. Although both are great actors, there was just way more depth in how Ledger portrayed the character. Christian Bale was fine, but there wasn't anything that stood out about his performance. As Adler said, "You cannot be boring!"
ReplyDeleteI think the best example of Brando's acting is the scene with him and Edie's glove. It's like even though that part wasn't in the script, he just went along with it because Brando was so immersed into his role that he knew picking up Edie's glove and wearing it, would be something that Terry would do.
I'm only familiar with the basic "memorizing your lines" which can usually make certain movies cheesy or just plain simple and not stand out from the rest. It is apparent when someone has just memorized the lines, added a dramatic feel to it and said them as best he could. I prefer method acting because the audience is capable of connecting with the character and getting attached to the character rather than just observing him.
ReplyDeleteThe best scene in the Waterfront so far is when Marlon is in the car with Charlie and he becomes passionate talking about how much of a bum he is because of Charlie. I felt my heart sink as Marlon told him "I coulda been somebody, Charlie...."
Zach - This is called melodramatic acting. Our best example from class? The over-the-top acting in Metropolis.
ReplyDeleteLet's expand our definition of "acting style." What about "squinty acting"? I'm thinking Twilight: Full Moon. And how about "too clever for your own good" acting? Or "cardboard acting"? These may not be official acting schools and philosophies, but I see plenty of them. And what about "hammy" and/or "overacting"? Maybe "low key" acting? "Flashy"? "Subtle"? Any others? Can you give examples for any of the one's I've listed?
ReplyDeleteI see overacting all the time. Usually in those movies that go straight to DVD. And theres a lot of singers who try out acting...sometimes it works out but most of the time it's a disaster. Paris Hilton had a couple movies of her own, too. I wouldn't even call that any type of 'acting style' because it was not acting. It was cheesy!
ReplyDeleteThere's also the type of acting where the actor fits the role because he IS just like the character. Have you noticed how Michael Cera, the young guy from Juno and the new movie Youth in Revolt, is always that 'awkward' kid. He seems like an awkward guy overall even when he's not behind the big screen. People love him for his awkwardness and seems like so do the people who cast him.
the only acting method i have ever heard of other than method acting is the one Mr. Cowlin explained in class in how the actor just comes in knowing the lines and depending on the mood and situation the character is in he changes the way he says the line. This seemed like a decent way to act back then and many actors did it but i do think method acting has really revolutionized the acting community because now actor don't just act the role they are the role and they eat, sleep and do the role and will try to get inside the characters head. I think when Brando did this he really made an impact on the movie and stood out compared to the other actors who were just acting regular. I think he really became the role he was suppose to portray. My favorite scene that really highlights his acting ability in this movie is the scene when he is in the bar with the Doyle daughter because i feel like everything he says and all he feels as the character really is that character saying it and is something that character would say. He does a great job the entire movie and I really enjoyed his acting.
ReplyDelete