Friday, March 16, 2012

Action Films vs Musicals

Step one: read this review of House of Flying Daggers from the New York Times:


MOVIE REVIEW | 'HOUSE OF FLYING DAGGERS'
"Fanciful Flights of Blood and Passion"
By A. O. SCOTT


The Chinese director Zhang Yimou first came to the attention of American audiences in the early 1990's, as the maker of stirring, visually glorious tales of historical turmoil and forbidden love like "Raise the Red Lantern" and "Ju Dou." Then, later in the decade, he entered a neo-realist phase, with rough-hewn, modest stories of peasant indomitability like "Not One Less" and "The Road Home."


Now in his early 50's, Mr. Zhang has embarked on the third chapter of an already dazzling career, reinventing himself as an action filmmaker, first with "Hero," a late-summer hit for Miramax, and now with "House of Flying Daggers," which Sony Classics is releasing.


Set in the twilight of the Tang Dynasty, and filmed, from the look of it, at the peak of China's foliage season, "House of Flying Daggers" is a gorgeous entertainment, a feast of blood, passion and silk brocade. But though the picture is full of swirling, ecstatic motion, it is not especially moving. A Chinese mainlander's tribute to the sword and martial-arts epics of the past, most of which were produced in Taiwan and Hong Kong, it also echoes the widescreen Technicolor westerns and musicals that the Hollywood studios cranked out in their early battle against television.


Mr. Zhang, who once directed a production of "Turandot" with a cast of thousands in the Forbidden City in Beijing, possesses an operatic ability to turn intimate stories into grand spectacles. His diva of the moment is Zhang Ziyi, whose delicate facial features fill the screen and whose lithe movements animate the film's heady combat choreography.


Ms. Zhang plays Mei, a blind courtesan who turns out to be a member of the Flying Daggers, a shadowy squad of assassins waging a guerrilla insurgency against the corrupt and decadent government. She is pursued by two government deputies, Leo (Andy Lau) and Jin (Takeshi Kaneshiro), whose loyalties come into question as the chase turns into a love triangle. Everyone is engaged in several layers of deceit, and some of the third-act revelations are more likely to provoke laughter than gasps of amazement.


But realism is as irrelevant a criterion here as it would be in an Italian opera. The movie is about color, kineticism and the kind of heavy-breathing, decorous sensuality that went out of American movies when sexual candor came in. Occasionally, Ms. Zhang bares one of her lovely shoulders. If she showed any more, the projector might catch fire.


It might anyway, from the sheer audacious heat of some of the action sequences. Two in particular - the "echo game" set piece that takes place in a brothel and a later battle in a grove of whispering bamboo - are likely to become classic reference points, cherished like favorite numbers from "Singin' in the Rain." It is a commonplace that action movies are closely related to musicals, and few directors prove the point with as much discipline and flair. The bamboo-forest scene is not just a bravura exercise in vertical and horizontal choreography. It is also a heroic feat of sound design, with the whistle of the bamboo fronds played in counterpoint to the impact of cudgels and spears.


The story inevitably gets lost in this sensory barrage, and it is hard to feel much for the three lovers as they sing their climactic arias of jealousy and betrayal. The final confrontation takes place in the midst of a sudden snowstorm, which envelopes the sun-dappled field that had, a few moments earlier, been a perfect spot for al fresco love-making. And "House of Flying Daggers" itself, for all its fire and beauty, may leave you a bit cold in the end.



Now read this review from the Chicago Sun Times:



House of Flying Daggers
"Stylish scenes make 'Flying Daggers' soar"
BY ROGER EBERT / Dec 17, 2004


Movie imagery, which has grown brutal and ugly in many of the new high-tech action pictures, may yet be redeemed by the elegance of martial arts pictures from the East. Zhang Yimou's "House of Flying Daggers," like his "Hero" (2004) and Ang Lee's "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon" (2000) combines excitement, romance and astonishing physical beauty; to Pauline Kael's formula of "kiss kiss bang bang," we can now add "pretty pretty."


Forget about the plot, the characters, the intrigue, which are all splendid in "House of Flying Daggers," and focus just on the visuals. There are interiors of ornate elaborate richness, costumes of bizarre beauty, landscapes of mountain ranges and meadows, fields of snow, banks of autumn leaves and a bamboo grove that functions like a kinetic art installation.


The action scenes set in these places are not broken down into jagged short cuts and incomprehensible foreground action. Zhang stands back and lets his camera regard the whole composition, wisely following Fred Astaire's belief that to appreciate choreography you must be able to see the entire body in motion. Tony Scott of the New York Times is on to something when he says the film's two most accomplished action scenes are likely to be "cherished like favorite numbers from 'Singin' in the Rain' and 'An American in Paris.' " Try making that claim about anything in "Matrix" or "Blade Trinity."


The scenes in question are the Echo Game, and a battle in a tall bamboo grove. The Echo Game takes place inside the Peony Pavilion, a luxurious brothel that flourishes in the dying days of the Tang Dynasty, 859 A.D. An undercover policeman named Jin (Takeshi Kaneshiro) goes there on reports that the new dancer may be a member of the House of Flying Daggers, an underground resistance movement. The dancer is Mei (Zhang Ziyi, also in "Hero" and "Crouching Tiger"), and she is blind; martial arts pictures have always had a special fondness for blind warriors, from the old "Zatoichi" series about a blind swordsman to Takeshi Kitano's "Zatoichi" remake (2004).


After Mei dances for Jin, his fellow cop Leo (Andy Lau) challenges her to the Echo Game, in which the floor is surrounded by drums on poles, and he throws a nut at one of the drums. She is to hit the same drum with the weighted end of her long sleeve. First one nut, then three, then countless nuts are thrown, as Mei whirls in mid air to follow the sounds with beats of her own; like the house-building sequence in the Kitano picture, this becomes a ballet of movement and percussion.


Jin and Mei form an alliance to escape from the emperor's soldiers, Mei not suspecting (or does she?) that Jin is her undercover enemy. On their journey, supposedly to the secret headquarters of the House of Flying Daggers, they fall in love; but Jin sneaks off to confer with his Leo, who is following them with a contingent of warriors, hoping to be led to the hideout. Which side is Jin betraying?


Still other warriors, apparently not aware of the undercover operation, attack the two lovers, and there are scenes of improbable delight, as when four arrows from one bow strike four targets simultaneously. Indeed most of the action in the movie is designed not to produce death, but the pleasure of elegant ingenuity. The impossible is cheerfully welcome here.


The fight in the bamboo grove inspires comparison with the treetop swordfight in "Crouching Tiger," but is magnificent in its own way. Warriors attack from above, hurling sharpened bamboo shafts that surround the lovers, and then swooping down on tall, supple bamboo trees to attack at close range. The sounds of the whooshing bamboo spears and the click of dueling swords and sticks have a musical effect; if these scenes are not part of the soundtrack album, they should be.


The plot is almost secondary to the glorious action, until the last act, which reminded me a little of the love triangle in Hitchcock's "Notorious." In that film, a spy sends the woman he loves into danger, assigning her to seduce an enemy of the state, which she does for patriotism and her love of her controller. Then the spy grows jealous, suspecting the woman really loves the man she was assigned to deceive. In "House of the Flying Daggers" the relationships contain additional levels of discovery and betrayal, so that the closing scenes in the snow field are operatic in their romantic tragedy.


Zhang Yimou has made some of the most visually stunning films I've seen ("Raise the Red Lantern") and others of dramatic everyday realism ("To Live"). Here, and with "Hero," he wins for mainland China a share of the martial arts glory long claimed by Hong Kong and its acolytes like Ang Lee and Quentin Tarantino. The film is so good to look at and listen to that, as with some operas, the story is almost beside the point, serving primarily to get us from one spectacular scene to another.


Now spend a few minutes and take a look at these three scenes both reviews mentioned. The first is from the film.




The second is a very famous scene from the film Singin' in the Rain.




And the third is a nearly as famous scene from An American in Paris.




Maybe you noticed that Ebert, in the second review, directly referenced Scott from the first review. Well, there seems to be one point on which the two critics agree and one point on which the two critics disagree. Your task is to write one thoughtful, thorough paragraph to one of the two prompts I've set up in the comments below. (The first prompt is about the similarity I just mentioned, and the second prompt is about the difference.) This is not an online discussion; rather, it is a thoughtful response to a prompt. Again, your entry should be a well written paragraph posted in the response field of one of the two comments I've posted.

For extra credit you may write a second response to the other prompt.

28 comments:

  1. PROMPT 1: Both critics contend that there is a connection between action movies and musicals. What is this connection? What common elements do the best musicals and the best action films share? Finally, do you agree with this assessment - that great action movies and great musicals utilize similar elements? Be specific in your response, and use a variety of examples from different films to support your claims.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Scott contends that "though the picture is full of swirling, ecstatic motion, it is not especially moving," and that "for all its fire and beauty, may leave you a bit cold in the end." Meanwhile, Ebert contends that "the relationships contain additional levels of discovery and betrayal, so that the closing scenes in the snow field are operatic in their romantic tragedy." So, which who's correct in his assessment? Be specific in your response, and use specific examples to fully justify your response.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Prompt 2: I agree with what Scott. I felt the same way about the film. How the moving was full of beauty and movement but at th end the film robs us of it. Everything is graceful and it seems warm almost. At the end though, it get so cold because the gracefulness is gone and there is snow now. Though everything is cold, I think it plays perfectly with the ending. The ending is a tragedy. It is not supposed to be beautiful. The beauty that the film portrays has died. This is really why I liked the ending.

      Delete
  3. Prompt 1:
    I think the connection between action movies and musicals is that both apply to the senses. They are both very visual with lots of movment that appeals to the audiences eyes. In other movies, the plot or stoy line may be more important that how the characters are moving. Action movies often rely on fight scenes where characters are engaged in ruthless battles that many auidence members would never see in the real world. In musicals, dance routines and numbers are often the only thing that distingush them from a regular movie. The choreography in both action and musical films are what the auidence is going to see.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, whenever I see a musical or action flick I look to see how good the choreography is. In my opinion it's the most important characteristic for each genre.

      Delete
  4. Prompt: 2
    Although at first I did not see the romantic relationship in the film, as the love making went on and the love triangle developed I felt the amount of rigor and emotion created between the characters. Personally, my beliefs are that the emotion bonds between the characters were so powerful that they could have caused a person to weep in the end of the movie; I almost certainly did. These bonds were created in numerous ways throughout the movie such as when Wind fights for Mei, although injured, and cares for her as if his true love even though he could have left at any time. In addition, nudity and sexual interaction was not needed to feel the intimacy between the characters but it would tell a story on its own as each time such intimacy was displayed it would have a deep impact on the audience. The act of sexuality used throughout the movie, such as the time after Mei took a bath, exposed the tension and the simplistic lust that waged within both characters minds. At other times these interactions would display how much things have changed and how little Mei cares about her past love Leo. This causes the audience to experience the emotional heart-break of Leo and his fury as emotions overtake his reason. In the final scenes of the snowstorm the love story snowballs into a climactic fight in which both men are willing to fight over a woman who is thought to be dead. They no longer care for the gashes in their sides and their blood staining the snow but would rather see the opposing competitor dead for the sake of love. Its really inspiring to see such romanticism that it even reminded me of Romeo and Juliet which I have not been reminded by any other movie. I think the bonding was thorough and developed beautifully when given time with occasion sparks of passion just like love in real life.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Narmandakh OtgonmunkhMarch 17, 2012 at 4:48 PM

    Promt1
    I think thier alike because,action films usually include high energy, big-budget physical stunts and chases, possibly with rescues, battles, fights, escapes, destructive crises (floods, explosions, natural disasters, fires, etc.), non-stop motion, spectacular rhythm and pacing, and adventurous, often two-dimensional 'good-guy' heroes (or recently, heroines) battling.As well as in musical/dance films,there are cinematic forms that emphasize full-scale scores or song and dance routines in a significant way (usually with a musical or dance performance integrated as part of the film narrative), or they are films that are centered on combinations of action, dance, song or choreography all designed for pure audience escapism.They were made to wow the audience and they also have certain ways of telling a story about something that is going to happen or already had happened!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Prompt 1:

    The one connection action movies and musicals have are their plots. The plots of both movies are similar but they are approached differently in each movie. Its obvious but one approaches in a non-violent way and the other approaches in a violent way. Action movies and musicals are similar because numerous reasons. Both have a lot of movement, they are choreographed beautifully and all of the steps made are very precise and right on key. The scenery is magnificent and full of life and the colors are vibrant. I agree with the statement that action films and musicals utilize very similar elements to create their wonderful movies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. For being from two different genres its wild how they have so much in common

      Delete
  7. Prompt 1:

    Well, I think that action movies and musicals are pretty similar. Aside from the fact that they are different in their genres, I feel that they both require a large amount of skilled choreography using choreographers that work for both types of movies. Another way they are alike is they keep similar sequences throughout the movie. In action movies you basically see good action in every other scene that tells you more about the main character’s action packed journey. And in Musicals every other scene is filled with a passionate dance or music number that tells more of the movie’s story. I find it cool that two different genres can be alike in so many ways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with you on this one. Both musicals and action movies show a scene with a certain amount of choreography.

      Delete
  8. Prompt 1:
    I think action movies and musicals are actually pretty similar, we just don't realize it. Both action and musicals require a certain skill of choreography. In action movies, you must choreograph fight scenes that look like fighting but isn't. This reminds me a lot of House of Flying Daggers also because all the fighting almost looked graceful and like dancing, like in musicals. Both musicals and actions movies use similar elements in which they both require a lot of movement and "pretending". I agree that it's very hard to just act like your fighting or dancing and make it seem realistic. They both require a ton of skill and choreography.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, I haven't really thought about action and musicals to be similar.

      Delete
  9. Promt 1
    Musicals and action films both utilize similar elements like using choreography in fighting scenes and dance/singing acts and they build off of them and create a story with action and drama and other emotions and thats how house of flying daggers was. It kind of relied on the fighting scenes because each fight had reasoning and deep emotion and same with musicals, choreographed with passion and meaning. I agree that the best type of action and musical films share many elements, things that make them different from regular movies like acts and routines. The routines have the same purpose as fight scenes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Prompt 1:
    Carefully thinking about it, action movies and musicals are very similar. Sure musicals don't have all the killing and fights, but the songs and dancing are just like the fight scenes in action movies. They are both carefully choreographed. The scenes from An American in Paris and Singing in the Rain are the closest because they both are musicals and have music, singing, and dancing. Then comparing them to the scene from House of the Flying Daggers, there is barely any comparison in terms of action and story. There is dancing in both of them, but the comparison goes deeper into the choreography and details of both the fighting and the dancing. Overall I believe that action movies and musicals are very similar in terms of choreography.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Prompt 1:

    I agree that action movies are pretty similar. I am not a huge fan of either, but I do see one driving element that fuels them: passion. The stories are not usually impressive, and the characters are usually pretty flat, but there is an emotion to them. Whether it is the adrenaline rush from action films or the romance and heart-felt singing in musicals, there is always emotions at the steering wheel. The events in both of these genres don't matter as much. Instead, well choreographed songs and dances or well choreographed fights with crazy camera work tell the story. Either way, the events are not what these to kinds of movies have going for them. It is the passion and drive that the filmmakers and choreographers have while making them, and that is why even though they are not my two favorite genres, I still respect both of them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Prompt 2
    I believe that the fighting was orchestrated to move the story along. With out the story and their love triangle the action would be meaningless and the action proves that both men love Mei. The bamboo scene is beautiful but what makes it more beautiful is that Jin is willing to kill soldiers on his side and die with Mei. Leo on the other hand has been undercover for years to show Mei he is worth it. I believe it is an operatic romantic tragedy. They all went through such lengths to save Mei and love her unconditionally. I believe the fighting does not overpower the romance and story. I believe it adds to it, like if the fights are just there to adorn the intriguing plot. I agree with Elbert.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with you on how the fighting does not overpower the romance and story. If anything, it intensifies the story knowing that the characters are fighting for love. So the romance ties into the fighting in ways that the audience could engage in and understand because they are actually fighting for another cause other than just fighting for safety, which they also do.

      Delete
  13. Pompt 1:

    I agree that musicals are much like action movies. Not in the sense that they are both musical, but both genres tend to have a lot of dancing and choreography in them. As we saw in The House of Flying Daggers, there were scenes that obviously choreographed as fight scenes but looked a ton like dance numbers. Also, in most musicals there is a romance twist to it, Flying Daggers was much more of a love story than anything else. I feel that the connections between both are great, although, I am not a fan of either. I enjoyed the movie to an extent because it was different but it didn't really hook me. That is besides the point. I feel that the connection between musicals and ation flicks are very close.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Prompt 1: I would consider this movie an "action movie" when compared to musicals in terms of choreography and attention paid to colour and detail. To answer the question, yes, there is a connection... And that dedication is the desire to portray a story so beautifully and comprehend able to the audience that one must go outside the box in order to accomplish this. The problem with many "action" movies is that the director just wants to get it shot and done in a timely fashion. The difference with this movie is that the attention paid to small detail really paid off, and really made the difference in whether or not the audience got the plot. That being said, I absolutely agree that the two share characteristics. Take for example the movie Titanic. Although this movie isn't an action per se, the detail that was incorporated (such as the song that the band plays as the ship is sinking, and the ways in that some of the kitchenware falls at the angle of the ship) is similar to that of the specific colour palettes and choreographed moves. However, I'm willing to go on a limb and say that one can't exist without the other.... Musicals will usually have some sort of action in it that could be a movie, and action movies need music to base the tempo of the action and what's actually happening to.

    ReplyDelete
  15. PROMPT 1: I agree that there is a connection between action movies and musicals. Both film types require there to be choreography of some sort. For example, musicals require dancing choreography while an action movie would require the choreography to properly dodge explosions in a Michael Bay film. They are also both over dramatic and loud at times (like explosions and musical numbers). I agree that great action movies and great musicals could utilize similar elements. They both require high energy and a lot of physical stunts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your ideas of choreography and how they are both dramatic

      Delete
  16. prompt 1:
    i think that house of flying daggers could be considered an action movie over a musical. i think action movies could be compared to musicals because of how coreagraphed it can be. i think it also compares to musicals not by the music but the plot lines which tent to be these romantic battle love plots. i am not the biggest fan of either action movies nor musicals i don't like either berry much but house of flying scatters made me change my opinions a little bit. when you look at all kinds of movies they all seem to go together better than you would think. i think another action movie like his one would be fun to watch in class.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Prompt 1 :

    Musicals and Actions are similar in many different ways, one being that in actions you as the actor have to have this certain type of appeal to your audience that keeps them interesting in not just the action and explosions but you as a person. In Musicals that’s the same way; you need to have this type of talent that keeps the audience from just hearing general music and singing. You need to have this talent that sets you apart from the general bases of a musical. Even though the 2 different genres are vastly different from each other, you can see that they both share the same common dynamics which their movies so amazing. It’s easy to put down Musical because they don’t give off the same drive as an action but if you look closely, it’s what the Main characters does weathers it’s the great acting, amazing singing, or awesome choreographs. It’s about what the main character brings to the movie that makes or breaks it in both genres.

    ReplyDelete
  18. PROMPT 2
    as Scott said, "though the picture is full of swirling, ecstatic motion it is not especially moving, and that "for all its fire and beauty, may leave you a bit cold in the end." I agree because look at the scene they had the drums and Mei was dancing. There where a lot of swirling and ecstatic motion and there were a lot of vivid colors also. The love between Mei and the two guys where so tense that at the end we did feel "a bit cold in the end" the fact that Mei died made it even worst. I think this was a great movie.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I also agree it was a cold ending. The love between Mei and new guy was new and the love between the old guy was old. The love was so intense that the two of them killed for each other for mei After she passed out and made them think she was dead. The fact she came back to life and died for nothing realy killed the ending. However it was full of life in the begging. It was a rommance between two lovers and in the end was killed by the ending. It was a tradegaey.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Prompt 1:
    Although the two genres are very different, they do share similarities. They both include a lot of movement and energy, stunts, settings, stories, and sometimes same idea of characters; good guy, bad guy.
    No, not always because action has more stunts, chases, figts, escapes etc. where as musicals are more emotional, focused more on story telling in music, and themes.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Prompt 1
    The connection that action movies and musicals have is that the both are very planed out and choreographed. In a way when in an action movie people are fighting it is almost the same as in a musical when people are dancing. They both tell a story just in a different way. When you look at an action there is fighting chase scenes etc. It has a more of a gripping overall storyline, but a musical is much more detailed and refined.
    Yes, I think that action movies and musicals are almost the same, they just have different ways of telling a story

    ReplyDelete